MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — The Minnesota Supreme Court has ruled that a suspected impaired driver does not have a limited right to an attorney before submitting to a blood test if police have a search warrant.
Wednesday's decision comes in the case of a woman arrested on suspicion of drunken driving in 2017 in Dakota County. A deputy got a warrant for a blood sample, but she tried to get those results tossed from the case because she wasn't given the chance to talk with a lawyer.
Prior case law found that a driver has a limited right to consult with an attorney before submitting to a blood test, but the Supreme Court says this case is different because police had a warrant, and a warrant protects rights of the accused.
Three justices disagreed with the majority.
- In Minnesota DWI case, lawyer is not a right if police have warrant
- Thousands arrested for DWI over the holidays in Minnesota
- Minnesota already seeing high number of DWI arrests in 2019
- DWI arrests up and Minnesota law enforcement cracks down
- Warrants issued in case of missing truck and dog
- Minnesota lawyer sent to prison for porn extortion
- Minnesota law enforcement arrest over 2,600 for DWI over the holidays
- Nearly 500 DWI arrests and four fatal crashes over Thanksgiving weekend in Minnesota
- 235 Minnesota drivers spend the Fourth of July behind bars for DWIs
- Winona woman pleads guilty to DWI