STREAMING NOW: Watch Now

Court: Order to unlock phone with fingerprint constitutional

The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that a judge's order requiring a man to provide his fingerprint to unlock his cellphone was constitutional and didn't violate his right against self-incrimination.

Posted: Jan 17, 2018 11:12 AM

ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that a judge's order requiring a man to provide his fingerprint to unlock his cellphone was constitutional and didn't violate his right against self-incrimination.

Wednesday's decision comes in the case of Matthew Diamond, who wanted burglary and theft convictions overturned in connection with a 2014 robbery in Chaska.

Diamond's attorney argued the district court violated Diamond's Fifth Amendment right. Police found incriminating evidence on the cellphone after it was unlocked. The Supreme Court ruling affirms an earlier ruling by the Minnesota Court of Appeals.

The justices say the act of providing a fingerprint to unlock a cellphone wasn't "testimonial" because it didn't require Diamond to use his mind to provide information. They likened it to providing physical evidence, like a blood sample or standing in a lineup.

Article Comments

Mason City
Overcast
40° wxIcon
Hi: 46° Lo: 32°
Feels Like: 31°
Albert Lea
Overcast
39° wxIcon
Hi: 45° Lo: 33°
Feels Like: 33°
Austin
Overcast
43° wxIcon
Hi: 47° Lo: 34°
Feels Like: 36°
Charles City
Overcast
41° wxIcon
Hi: 47° Lo: 33°
Feels Like: 34°
Rochester
Overcast
40° wxIcon
Hi: 45° Lo: 32°
Feels Like: 32°
Warmer weather is set to return this week
KIMT Radar
KIMT Eye in the sky

Latest Video

Image

MN AP football poll

Image

Mayo falls to Lakeville South in Section semis

Image

Figuring out Rochester's city budget

Image

Parking lot proposal

Image

Kavars trial: Day One

Image

Chris' PM Weather Forecast

Image

Affordable housing preservation program

Image

cold weather rule

Image

Highway speed changes

Image

Golden Apple: Julie Lawler

Community Events