The Trump administration's efforts to weaken Obamacare's contraceptive coverage mandate have now been blocked throughout the US.
A Pennsylvania district court judge issued a nationwide injunction on Monday preventing the administration from implementing the changes, which would have allowed more employers to get exemptions from the Affordable Care Act's requirement to provide insurance coverage for birth control with no co-pay.
Health and medical
Political Figures - US
Sexual and reproductive health
Business and industry sectors
Business, economy and trade
Pharmaceuticals and prescription drugs
Continents and regions
Government and public administration
Government bodies and offices
Health care policy and law
Health care reform
Labor and employment
Law and legal system
Northeastern United States
Political platforms and issues
US federal government
Belief, religion and spirituality
The rules were scheduled to take effect Monday.
Judge Wendy Beetlestone's ruling follows a similar California district court ruling on Sunday, but the latter only applies in the coalition of 13 states, plus the District of Columbia, that brought the lawsuit.
"Fundamentally, given the harm to the States should the Final Rules be enforced—numerous citizens losing contraceptive coverage, resulting in 'significant, direct and proprietary harm' to the States in the form of increased use of state-funded contraceptive services, as well as increased costs associated with unintended pregnancies—a nation-wide injunction is required to ensure complete relief to the States," Beetlestone wrote in her 65-page opinion.
"Today's ruling is a victory for the health and economic independence of women in Pennsylvania and across America," said Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, who filed the suit along with his counterpart in New Jersey. "Families rely on the Affordable Care Act's guarantee to afford care; before the ACA, families spent thousands of dollars in co-pays. Congress hasn't changed that law, and the President can't simply ignore it with an illegal rule."
Lawyers for California and Pennsylvania appeared in separate district courts last week to challenge the Trump administration's rules.
The first one would allow non-profit and for-profit employers, including publicly traded companies, to receive an exemption based on their religious beliefs. The second would let all but public companies obtain an exemption based on moral objections. Government employers cannot request exemptions.
The changes are part of the Trump administration's efforts to roll back regulations that conflict with some Americans' religious beliefs. The alterations to the contraceptive mandate's exemptions were first unveiled in the fall of 2017, and final rules were issued in November.
The administration estimates that roughly 200 employers with religious or moral objections would get exemptions under the final rule, though many already don't have to provide contraceptives under the previous rules. It says no more than 127,000 women would be affected.
Nearly 63 million women had insurance coverage that includes no-cost contraceptives -- which are used for birth control and other medical conditions -- in 2018, according to the National Women's Law Center.
Under the Obama administration, a fairly limited number of employers -- mainly churches and some other religious entities -- could qualify for an exemption.
Some others, such as religious-based universities or hospitals, could seek accommodations so that they didn't have to provide coverage, but their workers could still get contraceptives paid for by the insurer or the employer plan's administrator.
Democratic-led states successfully challenged the Trump administration's interim rules in federal district court. Pennsylvania won a nationwide injunction in late 2017, blocking the effort. California, which led a coalition of blue states, also won its effort to halt the interim rules, though an appellate court recently limited its scope to the five states that brought the lawsuit.