Donald Trump's 'self serving' strategy on leaks

On Friday morning, President Donald Trump fired off ...

Posted: Apr 28, 2018 7:47 AM
Updated: Apr 28, 2018 7:47 AM

On Friday morning, President Donald Trump fired off this tweet about fired FBI Director James Comey: "Is everybody believing what is going on. James Comey can't define what a leak is. He illegally leaked CLASSIFIED INFORMATION but doesn't understand what he did or how serious it is. He lied all over the place to cover it up. He's either very sick or very dumb. Remember sailor!"

It's the latest in a series of attempts by Trump to tar Comey with the "leaker" label. Comey has pushed backed, insisting that what he did -- giving unclassified memos to a friend to disseminate to the media in hops of forcing the appointment of a special counsel -- was not only entirely lawful but also in the public's best interests.

So, is Comey a leaker? A liar? Or a concerned citizen? In search of answers, I reached out to Heidi Kitrosser, a law professor at the University of Minnesota Law School, who specializes in "the constitutional law of federal government secrecy and on separation of powers and free speech law more broadly." Our conversation, conducted via email and lightly edited for flow, is below.

Cillizza: Let's start simple: Define "leak" in the context of the federal government.

Kitrosser: At the most basic level, a "leak" in this context means the unauthorized disclosure of information. That might range from a disclosure that is merely indiscreet -- say, of information that one's boss would prefer not be shared because it's embarrassing -- to a disclosure that conveys classified information to a person not cleared to receive it. In the context of the great Trump-Comey War of 2017-2018, Trump is alleging that Comey engaged in the latter type of leak -- that is, that Comey leaked classified information to the media, the public, or to others not cleared to receive it.

Cillizza: What makes a leak a potential criminal act?

Kitrosser: Focusing on the classified information context, there are a few potentially relevant statutes.

The broadest and most important one is the Espionage Act. Among other things, the act criminalizes the willful dissemination, "to any person not entitled to receive it," of any documents "relating to the national defense," or any "information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation."

You might notice that the quoted language does not specifically reference classified information. Indeed, the Espionage Act in its original form was written in 1917, long before the US government had a classification system in place. However, courts have read the "not entitled to receive it" language in light of the classification system. In other words, they interpret the language to mean that only those persons who are authorized, under the classification system -- which is largely a product of executive order and related regulatory actions -- to receive classified information are entitled to receive it under the terms of the Act. Given the breadth and malleability of the act's remaining requirements, the bare fact that information is classified often will be enough to bring it within the act's scope.

Cillizza: Explain the difference between whistleblowers and leakers.

Kitrosser: I think that there are at least two senses in which one can answer that question.

The first is in a colloquial sense focused on ethics and morality. Colloquially, I think that most people think of "whistleblowers" as persons who justifiably reveal wrongdoing. So from that perspective, a "whistleblower" is someone who is morally or ethically correct -- perhaps even duty-bound -- to reveal information, despite the fact that their superiors might not want them to do so.

Leaking, on the other hand, is a more morally and ethically ambiguous term. At best, it's morally and ethically neutral, and at worst it's used as a pejorative.

The other sense in which to consider the distinction is a legal one. Laws like the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 and the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 define some disclosures as "whistleblowing" and deem them protected disclosures.

Importantly, however, those particular laws do not cover the disclosure of classified information. Persons who convey classified information without authorization receive far less protection. Most notably, they are subject to prosecution under the Espionage Act. Indeed, Edward Snowden has said that he believes he could not get a fair trial were he to return to the US, because under the Espionage Act, it makes no difference if your disclosure revealed wrongdoing or served the public interest.

Cillizza: Donald Trump has repeatedly accused James Comey of illegally leaking the classified contents of memos he wrote. Comey has said he leaked unclassified information. How big a distinction is that?

Kitrosser: It's a very big distinction. Most importantly because a leak of classified information might implicate the Espionage Act, whereas a leak of unclassified information is unlikely to do so.

The distinction also has political resonance. Among other things, Trump clearly is trying to gain the political high ground by suggesting that Comey leaked classified information and somehow put America's national security at risk. Comey, in turn, maintains that the information was not classified and that the disclosures served the public interest.

Cillizza: Finish this sentence: "Donald Trump's accusations regarding leaks are _________." Now, explain.

Kitrosser: "Donald Trump's accusations regarding leaks are self-serving."

If this were a spoken conversation, this would be the part in which I sputter helplessly while trying to decide where to begin! But I suppose I'll put it this way: Trump is a guy who couldn't get enough of WikiLeaks throughout the 2016 campaign, and who, to put it mildly, has not exactly demonstrated concern or facility for keeping a lock on the vast trove of national security information to which he has access as President. So I find it, um, interesting, to witness his professions of concern that Comey's written recollections revealed information that may or may not have retroactively been deemed classified.

I should also mention, for context, that the classification system is notoriously overbroad. It thus is entirely possible that, of the thousands of persons with original classification authority, one might retroactively classify a memo that its author and informed others consider entirely innocuous from a national security perspective.

Minnesota Coronavirus Cases

Data is updated nightly.

Confirmed Cases: 24190

Reported Deaths: 1036
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Hennepin8181606
Ramsey2863122
Stearns201413
Nobles15125
Anoka136370
Dakota126354
Washington61731
Olmsted60810
Kandiyohi4901
Rice4522
Clay42426
Scott4082
Todd3130
Wright3051
Mower3031
Sherburne2372
Carver2062
Benton1753
Steele1590
Blue Earth1380
Martin1295
St. Louis11814
Freeborn1150
Pine890
Nicollet8610
Unassigned8610
Winona7915
Carlton730
Watonwan710
Cottonwood700
Crow Wing682
Goodhue663
Otter Tail640
Chisago611
Polk612
Itasca5410
Dodge520
Chippewa491
Lyon490
Morrison450
Meeker450
Le Sueur441
Douglas410
Becker390
Jackson390
Murray390
McLeod340
Isanti320
Waseca260
Rock220
Mille Lacs191
Faribault180
Swift180
Wabasha180
Fillmore171
Pennington170
Sibley160
Brown152
Beltrami140
Cass132
Norman130
Pipestone120
Kanabec111
Wilkin113
Marshall100
Pope90
Wadena90
Aitkin80
Koochiching70
Yellow Medicine60
Mahnomen61
Lincoln50
Renville50
Big Stone40
Grant40
Red Lake40
Redwood40
Clearwater30
Hubbard30
Traverse30
Lac qui Parle30
Roseau30
Houston20
Lake10
Kittson10
Stevens10

Iowa Coronavirus Cases

Data is updated nightly.

Confirmed Cases: 19217

Reported Deaths: 531
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Polk4160125
Woodbury274034
Black Hawk173944
Linn94976
Dallas89220
Marshall89216
Buena Vista7350
Johnson6149
Wapello5589
Muscatine55641
Crawford5142
Tama40227
Scott35810
Dubuque34518
Louisa34311
Jasper26116
Pottawattamie2578
Sioux2190
Washington1888
Wright1670
Plymouth1292
Warren1260
Allamakee1204
Story1091
Mahaska9310
Poweshiek908
Henry711
Bremer696
Des Moines621
Clinton611
Boone610
Taylor540
Clarke530
Guthrie503
Cedar461
Benton411
Webster391
Monroe385
Shelby370
Jones360
Hamilton350
Clayton343
Iowa330
Buchanan330
Osceola330
Marion320
Cerro Gordo281
Cherokee280
Madison282
Fayette270
Lee250
Winneshiek240
Monona240
Jefferson230
Harrison220
Davis210
Lyon210
Dickinson200
Grundy200
Mills190
Floyd191
Sac180
Humboldt170
Lucas170
Hardin160
Hancock160
Delaware150
Keokuk150
Clay150
Appanoose153
Butler151
Emmet140
Ida140
Page130
Greene130
Franklin130
Cass120
Howard120
Audubon121
Jackson120
Winnebago110
Pocahontas110
Chickasaw100
Carroll90
Van Buren90
Adair90
Kossuth90
Union70
Adams70
Montgomery70
Palo Alto60
Unassigned60
Fremont40
Mitchell40
Ringgold40
Worth30
Calhoun20
Wayne10
Decatur10
Rochester
Few Clouds
45° wxIcon
Hi: 72° Lo: 60°
Feels Like: 41°
Mason City
Clear
48° wxIcon
Hi: 74° Lo: 60°
Feels Like: 46°
Albert Lea
Clear
48° wxIcon
Hi: 74° Lo: 60°
Feels Like: 48°
Austin
Clear
48° wxIcon
Hi: 75° Lo: 62°
Feels Like: 48°
Charles City
Clear
48° wxIcon
Hi: 73° Lo: 59°
Feels Like: 46°
Sunnier skies for the weekend
KIMT Radar
KIMT Eye in the sky

Latest Video

Image

Rochester People's Rally

Image

Religious leaders call for justice for George Floyd

Image

Rochester downtown under curfew Saturday night

Image

Sean Weather 5/30

Image

Governor Walz GivesUpdate

Image

Gov. Walz Addresses Minnesotans in Overnight Press Conference

Image

Riots, Fires continue in Minneapolis

Image

Protesters in Downtown Rochester

Image

Mower County Fair will go on as planned

Image

Minneapolis Gas Stations Shut Down

Community Events