Gorsuch silent as court sharply divided on union fees

The Supreme Court on Monday appeared sharply divided in a case pitting organized labor against conservative groups in...

Posted: Feb 26, 2018 9:13 PM
Updated: Feb 26, 2018 9:13 PM

The Supreme Court on Monday appeared sharply divided in a case pitting organized labor against conservative groups in a case that could deal a potentially crippling blow to public sector unions -- and hurt their Democratic Party allies.

The court's four liberals seemed to back the unions' position. Conservatives, including Chief Justice John Roberts, Anthony Kennedy and Samuel Alito, appeared ready to rule against the unions and maybe even overturn the court's 41-year-old precedent. Justice Clarence Thomas didn't speak but he is expected to rule against the unions.

But conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch did not ask one question.

At the center of the debate is a 1977 Supreme Court opinion known as Abood v. Detroit Board of Education that says while non-members of public sector unions cannot be required to pay fees for a union's political activities, they can be required to pay so-called "fair share" fees pertaining to issues such as employee grievances, physical safety and training.

The Abood decision was a careful compromise when it came down 41 years ago, but in recent years, critics of unions have pushed for it to be overturned.

Today, 22 states have laws on the books that allow broad fair share fees for public employees.

Mark Janus, an Illinois public sector employee, is challenging the fees. He says that because he is a government employee, issues germane to collective bargaining are inherently political. He argues that the First Amendment protects him from having to support such political expression.

Justice Elena Kagan led the charge Monday in favor of the public unions' position expressing concern that if the Supreme Court were to take the rare step and overturn precedent, thousands of contracts impacting millions of employees could be in jeopardy.

"Those contracts probably cover millions, maybe up to over 10 million workers," the liberal justice said. "When have we ever done something like that?"

She was joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg who worried that overruling Abood would "drain" the public sector union's resources and even trigger members to stop paying for something others are getting for free. She said the impact could create "free riders" who could benefit from a union's representation but not have to pay for it.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor said that the challengers were basically arguing to "do away" with unions.

Gorsuch silent

Back in 2016, the justices heard a similar challenge and seemed poised to overturn Abood, but then-Justice Antonin Scalia died after oral arguments and the court announced a 4-4 split. On Monday, all eyes were on Scalia's replacement, Gorsuch, who could cast the deciding vote, but he stayed silent.

Janus is represented by groups such as the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation and the Liberty Justice Center, who argue that approximately 5 million public sector employees are required -- as a condition of their employment -- to "subsidize the speech of a third-party that they may not support, namely the government-appointed exclusive representative."

In court, lawyers for Janus appeared to draw the support of the conservative bloc. Alito was the most vociferous and seemed deeply concerned about the First Amendment implications of requiring employees like Janus to pay the fees.

"When you compel somebody to speak, don't you infringe that person's dignity?" he asked.

Kennedy expressed concern that even fees that go to collective bargaining for issues such as higher wages and working conditions could be highly political in nature.

"Doesn't it blink reality to deny that is what's happening here?" he said.

Jacob H. Huebert, one of Janus' lawyers, said his client specifically does not support the union's advocacy for increased spending, especially given Illinois' current fiscal condition.

"A lot of people in the private sector in Illinois are struggling with an increased tax burden and a stagnant economy and Mark Janus doesn't think it's fair to put more demands on his neighbors at a time like this," Huebert said.

Lee Saunders, president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, believes that the case boils down to corporate interests attacking the rights of workers.

"When working people are able to join strong unions, they have the strength in numbers they need to fight for the freedoms they deserve, like access to quality health care, retirement security and time off to work for a loved one," he said in a statement.

The unions point out that they are required by law to represent all employees regardless if they are members and that no one is required to join the union. They say that if non-members don't have any obligation to pay fair share fees for the collective bargaining obligations, they would become free riders, benefiting from the representation without sharing the costs. In addition, the coffers of public sector unions would suffer if non-members were able to get services for free.

They say the 40-year-old Supreme Court decision has left the decision in the hands of the states to decide how to proceed.

It's an argument supported by some Republican state lawmakers who have filed a brief supporting the unions and arguing the decision should be left to the states.

"As things stand, states can determine for themselves which rules work best for their work force and their communities, the court should not use the First Amendment to impose a single rule across the country that harms the ability of public sector workers to bargain together as unions," said Elizabeth Wydra, president of the Constitutional Accountability Center, which represents the lawmakers.

Minnesota Coronavirus Cases

Data is updated nightly.

Confirmed Cases: 24850

Reported Deaths: 1050
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Hennepin8393613
Ramsey3019124
Stearns202113
Nobles15395
Anoka139970
Dakota132755
Washington63632
Olmsted62610
Kandiyohi4961
Rice4622
Scott4262
Clay42328
Mower3182
Todd3160
Wright3131
Sherburne2432
Carver2102
Benton1773
Steele1580
Blue Earth1400
Martin1305
St. Louis11814
Freeborn1170
Pine890
Unassigned8910
Nicollet8710
Winona7915
Cottonwood750
Watonwan740
Carlton730
Crow Wing712
Otter Tail680
Goodhue663
Chisago611
Polk612
Lyon560
Itasca5410
Dodge520
Chippewa511
Morrison460
Meeker450
Le Sueur441
Douglas420
Becker400
Jackson390
Murray390
McLeod370
Isanti350
Waseca260
Rock220
Mille Lacs191
Pennington190
Faribault180
Swift180
Wabasha180
Fillmore171
Brown162
Sibley160
Beltrami150
Cass142
Norman130
Marshall120
Pipestone120
Kanabec111
Wilkin113
Wadena100
Pope90
Aitkin80
Koochiching80
Mahnomen61
Yellow Medicine60
Lincoln50
Redwood50
Big Stone50
Renville50
Red Lake40
Grant40
Lac qui Parle30
Clearwater30
Traverse30
Houston20
Hubbard20
Roseau20
Lake10
Kittson10
Stevens10

Iowa Coronavirus Cases

Data is updated nightly.

Confirmed Cases: 19521

Reported Deaths: 535
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Polk4227126
Woodbury275034
Black Hawk174644
Linn95577
Dallas90421
Marshall89416
Buena Vista7830
Johnson6149
Wapello59310
Muscatine55741
Crawford5162
Tama40327
Scott35910
Dubuque34418
Louisa34411
Sioux2750
Pottawattamie2638
Jasper26016
Washington1898
Wright1690
Plymouth1322
Warren1320
Allamakee1214
Story1151
Mahaska9410
Poweshiek908
Henry711
Bremer706
Des Moines631
Boone620
Clinton611
Taylor560
Clarke550
Guthrie503
Cedar471
Benton431
Webster401
Monroe385
Shelby370
Hamilton370
Jones360
Clayton353
Buchanan330
Iowa330
Osceola330
Marion320
Cerro Gordo291
Madison282
Cherokee280
Lee270
Fayette270
Jefferson270
Lyon240
Monona240
Winneshiek240
Harrison230
Davis220
Dickinson210
Grundy200
Mills190
Floyd191
Sac190
Humboldt180
Hardin170
Lucas170
Clay160
Butler161
Hancock160
Delaware150
Emmet150
Keokuk150
Appanoose153
Ida140
Franklin130
Page130
Greene130
Howard120
Cass120
Audubon121
Pocahontas120
Jackson120
Winnebago110
Carroll100
Chickasaw100
Kossuth90
Adair90
Van Buren90
Union80
Adams70
Montgomery70
Palo Alto60
Fremont40
Mitchell40
Ringgold40
Worth30
Calhoun20
Wayne10
Decatur10
Unassigned10
Rochester
Overcast
62° wxIcon
Hi: 85° Lo: 69°
Feels Like: 62°
Mason City
Few Clouds
63° wxIcon
Hi: 88° Lo: 69°
Feels Like: 63°
Albert Lea
Clear
64° wxIcon
Hi: 87° Lo: 69°
Feels Like: 64°
Austin
Clear
64° wxIcon
Hi: 89° Lo: 69°
Feels Like: 64°
Charles City
Clear
63° wxIcon
Hi: 86° Lo: 67°
Feels Like: 63°
Powerful storms and summer-like conditions are coming our way
KIMT Radar
KIMT Eye in the sky

Latest Video

Image

Planning to keep kids safe on the diamond this summer

Image

Hollandberry Pannekoeken prepares to reopen

Image

Sara's Daybreak Forecast - Monday

Image

Parking ordinances reinstated in Rochester

Image

Sara's Daybreak Forecast - Monday

${item.thumbnail.title}

StormTeam 3: Tuesday's Severe Weather Outlook

Image

Minnesota churches open doors to more congregants

Image

George Floyd protests continue in Austin on Sunday

Image

Sean Weather 5/31 2

Image

Rochester restaurant prepares to open patio to public

Community Events