Bakery allowed to refuse cake for gay wedding

A Kern County judge ruled in favor of a Bakersfield baker who refused to design a wedding cake for an already-married...

Posted: Feb 7, 2018 3:54 PM
Updated: Feb 7, 2018 3:54 PM

A Kern County judge ruled in favor of a Bakersfield baker who refused to design a wedding cake for an already-married same-sex couple last year.

Cathy Miller, owner of Tastries Bakery, was facing discrimination charges filed by the state.

Miller filed an opposition brief in January.

According to court documents from the ruling in favor of Tastries Bakery:

"A wedding cake is not just cake in Free Speech analysis. It is an artistic expression by the person

making it that is to be used traditionally as centerpiece in the celebration of marriage. There could

not be greater form of expressive conduct. Here... They plan celebration to declare the validity of their marital union and their enduring love for one another.

The State asks this court to compel Miller against her will and religion to allow her artistic expression in

celebration of marriage to be co-opted to promote the message desired by same-sex marital partners, and with which Miller disagrees.

Identifying the interests here as implicating First Amendment protections does not end the inquiry.

Furthermore, here the state minimizes the fact that Miller has provided for an alternative means for

potential customers to receive the product they desire through the services of another talent" -- Miller recommended her competitor to the same-sex couple after refusing to design them a cake.

The ruling goes on to say that "the fact that Rodriguez-Del Rios feel they will suffer indignity from Miller's choice is not sufficient to deny constitutional protection."

Patricia Ziegler-Lopez, who is representing Mireya and Eileen Rodriguez-Del Rio in the case, gave 23 ABC the following statement:

"We are disappointed but not surprised by ruling against the preliminary injunction. Bakersfield and Kern County in general is very conservative and that unfortunately includes some of the judges. But it's not over. Our fight against bigotry and discrimination is only beginning. I am going to speaking with the attorney that represents DFEH to plan the next step. To be clear this is no lawsuit filed yet."

Article Comments

Mason City
47° wxIcon
Hi: 53° Lo: 38°
Feels Like: 39°
Albert Lea
48° wxIcon
Hi: 52° Lo: 37°
Feels Like: 43°
54° wxIcon
Hi: 54° Lo: 40°
Feels Like: 54°
Charles City
Broken Clouds
54° wxIcon
Hi: 56° Lo: 39°
Feels Like: 54°
Broken Clouds
51° wxIcon
Hi: 49° Lo: 38°
Feels Like: 51°
Warmer weather is set to return this week
KIMT Radar
KIMT Eye in the sky

Latest Video


Tracking recent progress on corn and soybean crops


Successful weekend in Austin


Tuesday's StormTeam 3 Weather forecast


Kavars trial set to begin Tuesday


Child's show tackles tough issues


Chris' PM Weather Forecast 10/14


"Take Back Our Street" group forms


Indigenous People's Day or Columbus Day?


Community skating rink in Northwood?


Pub robbery in Rake

Community Events